ASTM G1 :- Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens

This practice covers suggested procedures for preparing
bare, solid metal specimens for tests, for removing corrosion
products after the test has been completed, and for evaluating
the corrosion damage that has occurred.

 Significance and Use

The procedures given are designed to remove corrosion
products without significant removal of base metal. This allows
an accurate determination of the mass loss of the metal or alloy
that occurred during exposure to the corrosive environment.

Reagents and Materials

Purity of Reagents—Reagent grade chemicals shall be
used in all tests. Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that
all reagents conform to the specifications of the Committee on
Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society where such specifications are available.4 Other grades may be used,
provided it is first ascertained that the reagent is of sufficiently
high purity to permit its use without lessening the accuracy of
the determination.

Purity of Water—Unless otherwise indicated, references
to water shall be understood to mean reagent water as defined
by Type IV of Specification D1193

 Methods for Preparing Specimens for Test

  •  For laboratory corrosion tests that simulate exposure to
    service environments, a commercial surface, closely resembling the one that would be used in service, will yield the most
    meaningful results
  • It is desirable to mark specimens used in corrosion tests
    with a unique designation during preparation. Several techniques may be used depending on the type of specimen and
    test.
  • Stencil or Stamp—Most metallic specimens may be
    marked by stenciling, that is, imprinting the designation code
    into the metal surface using hardened steel stencil stamps hit
    with a hammer. The resulting imprint will be visible even after
    substantial corrosion has occurred. However, this procedure
    introduces localized strained regions and the possibility of
    superficial iron contamination in the marked area.
  • Electric engraving by means of a vibratory marking
    tool may be used when the extent of corrosion damage is
    known to be small. However, this approach to marking is much
    more susceptible to having the marks lost as a result of
    corrosion damage during testing.
  • Edge notching is especially applicable when extensive
    corrosion and accumulation of corrosion products is anticipated. Long term atmospheric tests and sea water immersion
    tests on steel alloys are examples where this approach is
    applicable. It is necessary to develop a code system when using
    edge notches.
  • Drilled holes may also be used to identify specimens
    when extensive metal loss, accumulation of corrosion products,
    or heavy scaling is anticipated. Drilled holes may be simpler
    and less costly than edge notching. A code system must be
    developed when using drilled holes. Punched holes should not
    be used as they introduce residual strain
  • When it is undesirable to deform the surface of
    specimens after preparation procedures, for example, when
    testing coated surfaces, tags may be used for specimen identi�fication. A metal or plastic wire can be used to attach the tag to
    the specimen and the specimen identification can be stamped
    on the tag. It is important to ensure that neither the tag nor the
    wire will corrode or degrade in the test environment. It is also
    important to be sure that there are no galvanic interactions
    between the tag, wire, and specimen.

 Methods for Cleaning After Testing

  1. Corrosion product removal procedures can be divided
    into three general categories: mechanical, chemical, and electrolytic
  2. An ideal procedure should remove only corrosion
    products and not result in removal of any base metal. To
    determine the mass loss of the base metal when removing
    corrosion products, replicate uncorroded control specimens
    should be cleaned by the same procedure being used on the test
    specimen. By weighing the control specimen before and after
    cleaning, the extent of metal loss resulting from cleaning can
    be utilized to correct the corrosion mass loss.
  3. The cleaning procedure should be repeated on specimens several times. The mass loss should be determined after
    each cleaning by weighing the specimen.
To get this standard email your address at parjapatineeraj.999@gmail.com

3 thoughts on “ASTM G1 :- Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
%d bloggers like this: